Donate Image

Your Donations Count Donate Graphicat the Westside Observer!

E.T. San Francisco

SF’s Housing Snag

E.T. versus City.

•••••••••• August 2023 ••••••••••

Pretend you're an alien (E.T.) come to earth in human form to live and learn and even to rationally guide humans who have lost their way. You land in San Francisco.

You learn that San Francisco has committed to develop 82,000 housing units in eight years. What to do? 

You’ve learned that to accomplish something, incentivize; reward it. Provide rewards for what is wanted. 

But, frown, you find that SF disincentivizes the development of housing, piling on rules and costs and meetings and permits. Surely this is not the way to accomplish the goal.

Okay, how much can SF spend to accomplish the goal? Let’s say $1.5 billion per year. That’s a lot, but the goal is said to be very important. Also, SF spends heavily for its failure to provide sufficient housing: it spends on homeless, mental illness, hospital, street clean-up, crime and more, in part because of the lack of housing. These expenditures can be saved, and the avoided costs will offset a portion of the $1.5 billion. 


This is San Francisco. When does the rational thing happen? We avoid that dullness; we’re here to celebrate the irrational and emotional, to tilt dramatically at windmills, and to experiment with the radical and risky.”

So, with $12 billion (1.5 x 8) and a goal of 82,000 units, SF’s got $146,000 per housing unit. SF offers that for each added housing unit. Incentive. Reward. Prize. That’s how humans motivate. Eliminate disincentives (punishment), supply incentives (reward). 

This is not rocket science, nor even difficult. E.T. could and would figure it out. So the question is: why hasn’t the City Family figured it out?

Well, of course, the City Family has. It’s not stupid. It chooses not to incentivize housing because it wants to play both sides. It’s for both sides, the Yimbys and the Neighborhood Protectors. Which are you for? Like Chevron, the City Fam says “Yes!” 

Perhaps this is the way of the 21st Century. Haven’t we all learned that the answer to a difficult choice is “Yes!” 

Even an extraterrestrial could figure out how to motivate humans to get what’s desired. And so can the City Family–if it truly wanted to. 

Got one old house on one lot? Put four housing units on it, and earn prize money of 3 x $146,000 — 438k. Or, you’re a developer with a property that now doesn’t pencil out. Build ten units and earn a prize of $1.46 million when the new units open. Just add an ADU (accessory dwelling unit) and earn $146,000 when the tenant moves in.

Even the housing nonprofit that now plays the affordable housing game — CEO with bloated salary, nonprofit in control of allocating housing occupancy — could play for prize-money in addition to its present games.

Now, your correspondent isn’t suggesting that the above might happen. This is San Francisco. When does the rational thing happen? We avoid that dullness; we’re here to celebrate the irrational and emotional, to tilt dramatically at windmills, and to experiment with the radical and risky. No, we won’t go all E.T., will we? 

Steve Lawrence is a Westside resident and SF Public Utility Commission stalwart. Feedback:

July 2023

Have Your Say

More Trending Articles

Removing density controls in western and central SF?


Mayor’s Upzoning Plan Endangers Our Neighborhoods

by Dennis Antenore

Demolitions, speculations, and displacement are in store if the city moves forward with Breed’s approach.

Check it out
Employee Disparagement

SFPUC’s Employee discontent under Herrera

by Dr. Derek Kerr

Herrera’s team has settled in. The disruptions from the FBI probe and COVID had abated. Employee satisfaction should have improved. It didn’t.

Check it out

Twin Peaks Aerial

Big Changes in Store for Twin Peaks

by Jonathan Farrell

“As it is right now...there is no plan to manage and care for Twin Peaks

Check it out

School Closed

SFUSD Considers School Closures

by Carol Kocivar

No one wants to close schools. Not the communities. Not the school boards. Not administrators and school district personnel..

Read More

Turf a GGP

Phil Ginsburg: Stop poisoning our world

by David Romano

Will Rec and Park be satisfied when every square foot of Golden Gate Park is concrete and artificial turf?

Check it out

Every five years, the EPA determines the success of superfund cleanups

Gantry Crane

New Shipyard Report Confirms: Unsafe for Habitation

by Dr. Ahimsa Porter Sumchai

Take-home message: Cleanup efforts in 15 parcels and sites do not protect residents from hazardous substances, pollutants, and contaminants emanating from the dirty base

Check it out

© 2023 Westside San Francisco Media. No portion of the articles or artwork may be republished without expressed consent. Legal disclaimer.