spacer
Donate Image

Your Donations Count Donate Graphicat the Westside Observer!

Abandoned Elder
Granny dumping is defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as "the abandonment of an elderly person in a public place such as a hospital or nursing home.

San Franciscans Need to Raise Their Objections — Now

Laguna Honda Hospital’s Revised Closure Plan —Just Released

We Need to Demand: No Complete Closure of Laguna Honda

No Bed Cuts and Admissions Must Resume

Help Save 120 Beds at Laguna Honda Hospital

Laguna Honda Puzzle

Please Sign My Petition

Given our severe shortage of Skilled Nursing beds, DPH claimed it would do “everything it can” to save LHH’s 120 beds. But it hasn’t submitted a written waiver request yet!

Please share this petition widely with your contacts, I’d really appreciate your help.

We Also Need to Hold City Managers and Employees Responsible for LHH’s Mess Accountable, Up to and Including Termination

•••••••••• May 2023 ••••••••••

On Friday, April 21, news reared its ugly head that Laguna Honda Hospital (LHH) is still expected to accomplish — and is moving closer toward — full closure.

April 14, 2023 was the one-year anniversary of LHH’s decertification and the halt of any new admissions. San Francisco residents seeking SNF level of care at LHH have been dumped out-of-county ever since.

That’s because the “LHH Revised Closure Plan” obtained last Friday through a public records request placed by the Westside Observer states the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) expects LHH must discharge its remaining 537 residents as of April 14 before November 13, the same date all federal Medicare reimbursement to the hospital is scheduled to cease.

The closure plan: LHH's full "Anticipated Closure Date" is November 13, 2023. No if’s, and’s, or but’s.

The “Revised Closure” plan is available online. The meat of the 56-page plan is between pages 1 and 27, with most of the key information on pages 1 through 4.

The Backstory

If CMS and CDPH force LHH to close completely, we will lose seven times more desperately needed skilled nursing beds than the 120 beds a recent Change.org petition had initially set out to save. Now we’re back to needing to save all 769 beds at LHH!

LHH mostly serves low-income, medically indigent patients, who will likely face discharges, exile, and displacement to out-of-county facilities, away from their families, friends, and support networks. LHH is currently licensed for 769 patient beds, which will vanish if the facility is forced to close completely.

quote marks

LHH mostly serves low-income, medically indigent patients, who will likely face discharges, exile, and displacement to out-of-county facilities, away from their families, friends, and support networks. ”

Last November, CMS required LHH to submit a revisedClosure and Patient Transfer and Relocation Plan,” because LHH’s initial Closure Plan in May 2022 had been a poorly thought-out disaster, and 12 of 56 patients discharged from LHH last summer died within two months of their mandatory transfers. We can’t let that happen again!

LHH submitted its Revised Closure plan last December 21, and it has taken four months of back-and-forth negation and more required changes to the closure plan, before CMD/CDPH approved it on April 18. The Westside Observer finally obtained it under a public records request last Friday.

Discharges of all patients were supposed to have been completed by September 13, 2022, but were paused on July 22 due to 12 patient deaths post-discharge. Further transfers were extended only until February 2, and extended again to May 19. The discharges have been expected to resume as early as May 20, 2023, if CMS/CDPH don't extend the pause of mandatory discharges even further. Unfortunately, that doesn’t appear to be under active consideration. Hopefully, the pause might be extended again, but it’s extremely doubtful.

As one observer, a former geriatrician MD at LHH. notes: “The evidence of what a disaster this will be for hundreds of residents and their families is within the[revised closure] plan itself.”

Between October 14, 2021, and April 14, 2023, LHH's patient census has dropped by 157, from 710 residents to now just 537. The revised closure plan shows that of LHH’s 537 current remaining residents, 34 patients have advanced dementia and are at high risk of wandering and elopement who are on a locked/secured memory unit; 142 require memory care for moderate-to advanced-cognitive deficits; 85 are monolingual patients needing SNF level of care; 34 patients need shorter-term skilled nursing rehabilitation; 44 are HIV/AIDS patients; 43 are receiving palliative care or hospice care; and 105 residents have complex medical problems needing total care and high levels of support. All of them are at high risk of eviction.

Table of resident type

For those interested a table showing the net attrition by types of patient care in the one-year period between the initial closure plan in May 2022 and the new revised closure plan is available online, here.

The closure plan reports that as of December 21, 2022, there were only 1,228 skilled nursing beds in San Francisco (which has worsened with the closure of "The Marina on the Green” SNF, losing 32 beds two weeks ago). Of those 1,228 SNF beds, only one — yes, 1 — bed is available for LHH patients. San Francisco only has 15 beds available in Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly; 30 beds available in Residential Supportive Housing; 9 beds available in Residential Substance Abuse Treatment facilities; zero available beds in SNFs that provide mental health services; and 28 available beds in board-and-care homes, respite facilities, and shelters (which are — obviously — unsafe for patients needing medical care).

That totals approximately 98 beds available in various types of facilities in San Francisco — including the single skilled nursing facility bed available. Unfortunately, the Closure Plan doesn’t wade into describing whether any of the 98 beds in San Francisco facilities accept patients with Medi-Cal as their insurance payor source. 99.1% (532) of LHH’s patients' residents are on Medi-Cal. Just one current resident is in a Medicare-managed Care HMO plan.

There are virtually no places in-county for LHH's current 537 residents. They’ll likely wind up in out-of-county facilities.

As one person who left a comment on this Change.org petition noted, “Current and potential residents shouldn't be penalized due to the incompetence of overcompensated bureaucrats and/or their hired guns.” She was referring to LHH managers brought in from San Francisco General Hospital and SFDPH who had no experience with skilled nursing facilities and were running LHH as if it were an acute-care hospital, which by LHH’s own admission led to LHH’s decertification one year ago on April 14, 2022.

Key Highlights in Revised Closure Plan

Some key takeaways in the "LHH Revised Closure Plan” LHH has been “negotiating” with CMS/CDPH for the past four months include:

  • There is no mention of whether CMS and CDPH have decided yet whether to further extend the pause on transfers scheduled to end on May 19 and perhaps resume on May 20. We won’t know until we’re told, but it’s something we San Franciscans should continue to advocate against with D-7 Supervisor Myrna Melgar and the full Board of Supervisors during their May 9 Committee of the Whole Hearing at the full Board, that will probably be scheduled at 3:00 p.m. and may take public comment both in-person and remotely.
  • Footnote #6 on page 3 seems to suggest that if LHH gains its re-certification and admissions of new patients might resume, patients previously discharged to other skilled nursing facilities (mostly out-of-county) since last summer “could expect to return,” and perhaps be re-admitted from out-of-county facilities. That “could" remains a big "if.
  • We'll see if re-admit candidates get moved to the top of any waiting lists for new admissions or empty beds. That’s why LHH’s planned and potentially required 120-bed cut issue needs to be resolved concurrently. It is a big deal!
  • Page 4 states “Laguna Honda may, in its discretion, discharge patients who no longer meet the requirements for SNF level of care, as well as patients who present a danger to other residents and the institution, are unable to have their needs met at LHH, and require placement in a different setting outside of Laguna Honda.”
  • This appears to be a CDPH clarification finally adding some clarity about so-called CMS Phase 3 regulations around behavioral health patients being potentially inappropriately placed at LHH where they don’t receive the most appropriate level of care and treatment services they deserve to receive, and retention long-term of patients once they no longer have skilled nursing level-of-care needs at LHH.
  • Page 5 of the Revised Closure Plan specifically states: “As the Closure Plan is implemented, Laguna Honda, in conjunction with DHCS, will provide a daily update to CMS and CDPH on the progress in transferring patients, including where they are being transferred until all patients are transferred.
  • Since the Plan doesn’t specifically state this, if the Closure Plan does go into effect on May 19, the pause on transfers is not extended, and mandatory discharges resume on May 20, we will need to advocate strongly with Supervisor Melgar and the Board of Supervisors to require that SFDPH and LHH resume posting weekly progress reports in the same format they had used last summer on a public website, at minimum, so we don’t have to place public records requests each week to track the progress of discharges.
  • There may be a potential glimmer of hope that the current pause on discharges and transfers might be extended beyond May 19. Pages 32–33 states: “Laguna Honda plans to transfer or discharge all patients by the new anticipated closure date of November 13, 2023 (unless CMS agrees to pause transfers and involuntary discharges initiated pursuant to the revised Closure Plan or Laguna Honda is recertified in either the Medicare or Medicaid programs).”
  • That may be another big “if,” since LHH is way behind even beginning to apply for re-certification, and is still struggling to demonstrate to CMS and CDPH that LHH is making significant progress toward substantial compliance with CMS' regulations for skilled nursing facilities.

How You Can Help

First, sign the Change.org petition. It would help immensely to document to the Board of Supervisors, the Health Commission, LHH, and CMS and CDPH that there is strong community resolve to preserve our beloved skilled nursing facility and rehabilitation center. Please share the petition widely with your friends, families, co-workers, and social media contacts to help garner more signatures in a public display of unity. The Change.org petition is available at https://chng.it/wzzKhRKHxv .

Signing on could be the most important thing you could do today!

As well, San Francisco’s Gray Panthers organization has declared that "we must continue the community outcry to every agency involved. San Franciscans, present and future, must not suffer and die due to lack of services at Laguna Honda."

Local officials, State officials and Federal government officials all need to hear from San Franciscans that Laguna Honda must be saved with all beds intact, and we need admissions to restart. You can follow the Gray Panther’s “Call to Actionhere to obtain advice on talking points and provide testimony to the Board of Supervisors.

We must all help to protect the City’s most vulnerable residents at Laguna Honda!

Monette-Shaw is a columnist for San Francisco’s Westside Observer, and a member of the California First Amendment Coalition (FAC) and the ACLU. He operates stopLHHdownsize.com. Contact him at monette-shaw@westsideobserver.com.

 

May 2023

Ad

More articles by Patrick Monette-Shaw...

Click to find more investigative articles by Monette-Shaw.


More Trending Articles


Wolf in sheep's clothing

Sowing Discord

by Julie Pitta

Big money ‘neighborhood’ groups step up their campaign of take-over tactics in 2024 elections.

Check it out

Popular bay view

Say NO to expanding yacht harbors for the wealthy

by Evelyn Graham

Rec and Park’s plan expands access for the privileged few bupkis for the rest of us.

Check it out

New proposed site

New proposed location for Ocean View Library is ideal

by Glenn Rogers

Few were surprised when Supervisor Safai learned the library was not to be built in the Greenbelt — he feared the worst. No library at all.Since 2023, the Library Commission has been considering 466 Randolph Street, where the I.T. Bookman Community Center and the Pilgrim Community Church are located.

Check it out

SF from Alameda Point

San Francisco. In Alameda? Wait, what?

by David Osgood

When the runways for the Alameda Naval Air Station were extended out into the bay—using dredged bay fill, the same way Treasure Island was created — they crossed over the city line. The federal government apparently didn't know or care.

Read More ...

Man in Wheelchair

San Franciscans need nursing home care

Will Laguna Honda Admissions Start Soon?

by Dr. Teresa Palmer

The survey attests to a quality of care that is higher than in for-profit private nursing homes. But there are ongoing problems.

Read More

PARKING CONTROL

parking tickets for RVs on Winston

RV residents on Winston Drive face uncertain future

by Thomas K. Pendergast

A four-hour parking limit is going to make things even more difficult for RV residents.

Check it out

© 2023 Westside San Francisco Media. No portion of the articles or artwork may be republished without expressed consent. Legal disclaimer.